{"id":1040,"date":"2012-12-29T22:31:07","date_gmt":"2012-12-30T03:31:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/allebach.goodgallery.com\/blog\/?p=1040"},"modified":"2012-12-29T22:55:36","modified_gmt":"2012-12-30T03:55:36","slug":"camera-of-the-year-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/allebachphotography.com\/blog\/camera-of-the-year-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Camera of the Year – 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"

Two camera’s this year caught my eye for doing something no other cameras have done in their price range before. \u00a0I thought them both deserving of my camera of the year award. \u00a0Many people ask me for recommendations for cameras and if you are in the market, you’ll won’t be disappointed in either.<\/p>\n

Sony RX100 20MP <\/a>\"\"\u00a0(approx $650)<\/strong>
\n\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/p>\n

The Sony packs a serious punch. \u00a0When it was released The New York Times named it “The Best Pocket Camera Ever Made”. \u00a0The problem with most pocket size cameras is not their “megapixels” but their sensor size. \u00a0Sensor size is muuuuuucccchhh more important than megapixels. \u00a0Professional cameras have big sensors and pocket cameras have small meaning you get crappy photos. \u00a0The Sony packed a pro size sensor, professional quality lens, fast autofocus (you’ll catch your kids in focus now) and a whole ton of features that professionals love. \u00a0But anyone can use this camera!<\/p>\n